<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Single Word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/</link>
	<description>Technology is neither the problem nor the solution.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/#comment-10598</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/#comment-10598</guid>
		<description>The useful thing abut Elluminate, in particular, is that it provides a visual channel for communication and activities. This is particularly productive with math classes (trying to handle equations and the like in IRC, like doing so over the phone, is painful) and language learning... but in almost every case it opens the door, potentially, to much more interesting interactions and opportunities for students to be doing things that IRC and audio don't allow for. 

Unfortunately, Elluminate can be abused in many of the same ways other tools can, with the caveat that it is probably even MORE damaging-- Death by Powerpoint is never so cruel as when it happens via remote.

The question of assessment in a networked classroom is interesting to me from a different perspective. I think there is something to the idea of Connectivism and it seems to me that if information fluency, network building, and participation in the networked world of information can be valuable, there must be some evolution in the way we assess learning to include them. So far I see almost nothing beyond strange extrapolations of the models we use for evaluating papers, essays, and face-to-face communications...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The useful thing abut Elluminate, in particular, is that it provides a visual channel for communication and activities. This is particularly productive with math classes (trying to handle equations and the like in IRC, like doing so over the phone, is painful) and language learning&#8230; but in almost every case it opens the door, potentially, to much more interesting interactions and opportunities for students to be doing things that IRC and audio don&#8217;t allow for. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, Elluminate can be abused in many of the same ways other tools can, with the caveat that it is probably even MORE damaging&#8211; Death by Powerpoint is never so cruel as when it happens via remote.</p>
<p>The question of assessment in a networked classroom is interesting to me from a different perspective. I think there is something to the idea of Connectivism and it seems to me that if information fluency, network building, and participation in the networked world of information can be valuable, there must be some evolution in the way we assess learning to include them. So far I see almost nothing beyond strange extrapolations of the models we use for evaluating papers, essays, and face-to-face communications&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Responses to Phaedrus &#124; EDUC 628-Spring-08</title>
		<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/#comment-10574</link>
		<dc:creator>Responses to Phaedrus &#124; EDUC 628-Spring-08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/#comment-10574</guid>
		<description>[...] off I went clicking on every link that was hooked up to the original blog spot from Dr. Lowell’s http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/ to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] off I went clicking on every link that was hooked up to the original blog spot from Dr. Lowell’s <a href="http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/" rel="nofollow">http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/</a> to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexie</title>
		<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/#comment-10566</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/#comment-10566</guid>
		<description>I saw and read this post last night and thought about Dr. Lowell, I wonder if he paid Mr. Fisher to write it?  I really thought we had found the pseudo writer here.  I understand the process and thinking, but it took time.  You figure it out at the end of the first semester with Dr. Lowell, or at least I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw and read this post last night and thought about Dr. Lowell, I wonder if he paid Mr. Fisher to write it?  I really thought we had found the pseudo writer here.  I understand the process and thinking, but it took time.  You figure it out at the end of the first semester with Dr. Lowell, or at least I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webb&#8217;s Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Assessment in the wiki world</title>
		<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/#comment-10565</link>
		<dc:creator>Webb&#8217;s Media &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Assessment in the wiki world</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2008/03/24/a-single-word/#comment-10565</guid>
		<description>[...] so inspired to comment on the massive comments in my aggregator. Through a chain of reading, I see Nate talking about Clarence&#8217;s post, which discusses the concept of how students should be assessed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] so inspired to comment on the massive comments in my aggregator. Through a chain of reading, I see Nate talking about Clarence&#8217;s post, which discusses the concept of how students should be assessed [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
