<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Definitions of Distance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/</link>
	<description>Technology is neither the problem nor the solution.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 13:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe McConda</title>
		<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/#comment-5060</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe McConda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/#comment-5060</guid>
		<description>After reading this blog and "On Distance Education" I realize that my definition involved only the physical seperation of the teacher and learner and the technology that allows them to communicate. I also see why this is a poor definition. I see the idea of the separation of the teacher and the learner even in the traditional classroom as being thought-provoking and very real. At this time, I could not give an accurate definition, but I think I am headed in the right direction. I like doing this reading (listening)- thinking- responding- re-thinking approach to learning. Maybe after doing this a few more times I might come up with a decent definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading this blog and &#8220;On Distance Education&#8221; I realize that my definition involved only the physical seperation of the teacher and learner and the technology that allows them to communicate. I also see why this is a poor definition. I see the idea of the separation of the teacher and the learner even in the traditional classroom as being thought-provoking and very real. At this time, I could not give an accurate definition, but I think I am headed in the right direction. I like doing this reading (listening)- thinking- responding- re-thinking approach to learning. Maybe after doing this a few more times I might come up with a decent definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tippi Thompson</title>
		<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/#comment-5038</link>
		<dc:creator>Tippi Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/#comment-5038</guid>
		<description>In that case 'distance' can be defined as a new topic that students have mastered yet.  When someone is talking about something new (ie. blogs, gators) don't you feel like you are in 'left field'? I certainly did.  And, if that's the case what about the student who has no interest in your class, is that Distance Education?

'm jes' sayin'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that case &#8216;distance&#8217; can be defined as a new topic that students have mastered yet.  When someone is talking about something new (ie. blogs, gators) don&#8217;t you feel like you are in &#8216;left field&#8217;? I certainly did.  And, if that&#8217;s the case what about the student who has no interest in your class, is that Distance Education?</p>
<p>&#8216;m jes&#8217; sayin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowell</title>
		<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/#comment-5035</link>
		<dc:creator>lowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/#comment-5035</guid>
		<description>Actually, I'd argue the other way, and say classroom could be considered no different than distance education. It has the same distinguishing characteristics of using technology, seaparation of teacher and student by a (small) distance), and the separation of labor in the production of the educational experience.

Spoken language IS a technology. The fact that it doesn't have to be plugged in doesn't make it any less so. There IS a distance between you and your student, even if it's only a meter. And you don't write and publish your own text books, or maintain your own registration system, or even manage the library. 

'M jes' sayin'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;d argue the other way, and say classroom could be considered no different than distance education. It has the same distinguishing characteristics of using technology, seaparation of teacher and student by a (small) distance), and the separation of labor in the production of the educational experience.</p>
<p>Spoken language IS a technology. The fact that it doesn&#8217;t have to be plugged in doesn&#8217;t make it any less so. There IS a distance between you and your student, even if it&#8217;s only a meter. And you don&#8217;t write and publish your own text books, or maintain your own registration system, or even manage the library. </p>
<p>&#8216;M jes&#8217; sayin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Murphy</title>
		<link>http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/#comment-5034</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://durandus.com/phaedrus/2007/08/30/definitions-of-distance/#comment-5034</guid>
		<description>Couldn't all of these technologies also be used in a normal classroom? I believe that the issue with most technology is that of an issue of fluency. Teachers can use these technologies to bridge the gap even in the classroom but can also use them to challenge the student. 

If I compare the differences between a class and the distance education setting I feel that there is an open line of communication that can easily be navigated via speech. Distance education now with web cams etc can make the environment analogous to a classroom since face to face meeting can be set up readily. 

So I guess that there is a reasonable argument that distance learning could be considered no different than classroom learning just in a different media that some are not as fluent in. Will there be a time when schooling takes place at home with students playing games and chatting with their instructor virtually over a web cam? I think that it may already be here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t all of these technologies also be used in a normal classroom? I believe that the issue with most technology is that of an issue of fluency. Teachers can use these technologies to bridge the gap even in the classroom but can also use them to challenge the student. </p>
<p>If I compare the differences between a class and the distance education setting I feel that there is an open line of communication that can easily be navigated via speech. Distance education now with web cams etc can make the environment analogous to a classroom since face to face meeting can be set up readily. </p>
<p>So I guess that there is a reasonable argument that distance learning could be considered no different than classroom learning just in a different media that some are not as fluent in. Will there be a time when schooling takes place at home with students playing games and chatting with their instructor virtually over a web cam? I think that it may already be here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
