Rob Wall, up in Saskatchewan, often has some insightful comments and yesterday he had this to say about Education and the Long Tail:
Day of the Longtail at StigmergicWeb
[W]hat happens when we start to see an educational long-tail effect? Can students used to infinite choice and variety, and expecting that they are able to communicate, interact and critique freely going to be satisfied by a course of studies that they have no voice in creating? Obviously I think not, but are schools ready for this kind of student? What happens when not just markets but curricula are conversations?
First, “The Long Tail” is explained in a post I made over on Cognitive Dissonance complete with pictures.
Second, I would submit that we need to consider that Education is already a “long tail” because a lot of people are participating in a few Educational efforts while a few people are participating in a lot of other Educational efforts.
We need to be clear that Education is only tangentially related to Learning. We are human, therefore we learn. We learn stuff everyday. Most of the time it’s trivial stuff — Who got voted off the island? What’s in the bunker? — but sometimes it’s kinda cool — a new shortcut to the office, another recipe for ramen. Oh, and last, there’s the things we learn as a result of somebody trying to teach us something. What we learn as an outcome of Education is a very small subset of everything we learn, and of that, what the teacher intended us to learn is an even smaller subset.
I would submit to Rob, that curricula are already conversations. It’s just that the teachers are the onees who are not in it. They persist in the misguided notion that what they lay out as the outcomes are the outcomes that students will take on. Teachers continue to believe that they control the students’ learning. And while it may be true that they teach students to dislike Chemistry, or to compensate for a lack of enthusiasm for Chaucer, I would argue that the degree to which they create knowledgeable, enthusiastic participants from their students rests less with the teachers’ efforts than with the learners’ interests. The role of the teacher, therefore, seems to be primarily to convince the student that what they’re sellin’ is worth the student’s time in buyin’.
And given that fundamental belief, what do you all think of the way I’ve made you take on technology tasks that you — if we’re honest with each other — had no interest in pursuing?
Posted in Education, Technology | No Comments »